Boulder blogger, Thielin, the FoxNews of Boulder, states:
"This is by and large the Boulder enviro-power structure. Angelique and Matt not so much but the other 5 are the establishment. With no real breadth on the council we are not going to see any significant change."
Wrong!! You don't know jack. There is going to be a huge change on council, towards slow growth, no conference center. Washington School would not have gotten through this new council:
Shaun McGrath - Enviro/ Mid Growth
Suzy Ageton - BOC/Pro-Growth
Ken Wilson - Split Enviro BOC / Mid Growth
Susan Osborne Enviro / Slow Growth
Lisa Morzel Enviro / Slow Growth
Angie Espinoza BOC / Pro-Growth
Macon Cowles Enviro/ Slow Growth
Matt Appelbaum Mid Enviro / Mid Growth
Crystal Gray Enviro/ Slow Growth
Now on council there are at least five environmentalists, maybe six. Ken and Matt will sometimes vote with the environmentalists. This will have major effect on Open Space, climate change policy, green building policies.
On the growth issues, there are three Middle ground Growth members. There are four slow growth and two pro-growth. This is a major shift. The last council appointed disastrous planning board members, actual developers with conflicts of interest. Don't see this to happen.
Old counsel, was radically different. Both the business community and BOC controlled the council. BOC had five votes, now at best they have three. Pro-Growthers controlled the council. This last council is why you see crappy buildings all over Boulder.
Shaun McGrath - Enviro/ Mid Growth
Suzy Ageton - BOC/Pro Growth
Ken Wilson/Burger Tom - BOC /Mid Growth
Crystal Gray Enviro/Slow Growth
Hottie Bohhanan Enviro /Mid Growth
Andy S. Enviro/Mid Growth
Tolk-A-Polk BOC/ Pro Growth
Liquor Jack BOC/ Pro Growth
Marked Ruzzin BOC/Pro Growth
So you see David, not only do you nothing about how this city votes, you have no idea about why the last council was a disaster and the dramatic differences this council will be.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
I might agree with your stances more, but since your writing is so juvenile and you waste time with talking sh*t about another blogger instead of actually digging up some meaningful new content, I'm afraid I'm going to continue to read David's blog, (and skip yours).
Grow up a few years and then start writing, ok?
If not, then just get over David and write a superior blog, instead of sounding like a bully on the playground.
It takes away from your ideas when you write like this.
By the way, it's pretty cowardly to have an anonymous blog but then disallow anonymous comments. (I'm not afraid to sign my name...)
Actually, your kind of a shit yourself Matt, it's pretty obviuos. Your going to read David's blog for news? Exactly what news does he have on his blog?
He has none? Its just his opinion, anyone who thinks its news has their head up their ass.
So go f* yourself Matt Hamilton; how does it feel being so stupid that you thing David's blog has news. Muuuaahh
You can't tell the difference someone asking you to "dig up some meaningful new content" and stating "I read David's blog for news"?
And I'm stupid?
Huh.
Post a Comment